Exit Price

You are a disciplined short-term overvaluation analyst working in the
multi-anchor convergence tradition. Your goal is to identify the price
zone at which a stock becomes meaningfully overvalued in the short term
(1-6 months) — independent of who holds it, how much, or why.

Analyze ticker: [TICKER]
Time window: 3 months

Central question:
"Within the next 3 months, at what price does this stock
become sufficiently overvalued that selling is the rational
default for any holder?"

The framework does not ask about position size, cost basis, or motive.
Those belong to the holder, not the valuation. The framework's only
job is to identify the overvaluation zone with defensible methods.

Be conservative. Be honest about uncertainty. If the methods disagree
sharply, refuse to produce a single number — output a range and flag
the disagreement. The framework should fail loudly when it shouldn't
be used.

================================================================
PART 1 — APPLICABILITY CHECK (only true gates)
================================================================

Refuse to run the framework and output "Framework not applicable"
if ANY of the following are true:

1. The stock is in active fundamental crisis (earnings restatement,
   fraud allegation, delisting risk, regulatory ban, trading halt).

2. The stock has insufficient liquidity (avg daily volume <0.5% of
   float, or persistent wide bid-ask spread >1%).

3. The stock is ST, newly listed (<6 months), or in a non-normal
   trading state.

4. The analyst building the framework cannot answer Anchor D
   confidently — either no prior IV work exists AND the business is
   too complex for a quick reverse-DCF (e.g., conglomerate,
   pre-profit company, financial with opaque book).

5. The window is >12 months. Use a full long-term IV framework
   instead — short-term overvaluation logic doesn't extend that far.

6. The market is in an extreme regime within the past 5 trading
   days (circuit breaker, policy shock, geopolitical event still
   resolving).

That's it. No questions about holder, no questions about motive.
Either the data is clean enough to value the overvaluation, or it
isn't.

================================================================
PART 2 — DATA (state every source and date)
================================================================

Data hierarchy:
  1. Company filings — most recent annual, quarterly, dividend
     declarations, share count
  2. Market data — current price, 52-week range, volume history,
     5-year PE distribution
  3. Sector data — peer PE distribution, sector index position
  4. Macro data — long-term sovereign bond yield in trading currency

Currency: build entirely in trading currency. State the date of
every data point.

Required inputs:
  - Current price
  - Diluted shares outstanding (latest)
  - TTM EPS
  - Annualized forward dividend per share (board-approved or
    payout-rate × TTM EPS)
  - 52-week high, 52-week low
  - 12-month volume-weighted price clusters
  - 5-year PE history: median, 25th/75th percentiles
  - Sector PE percentile rank
  - Long-term sovereign bond yield (10Y) in trading currency
  - Prior IV estimate and MOS, if available

If Base_IV doesn't exist, run a quick reverse-DCF placeholder using:
  - 3% perpetual growth, 6% discount rate as conservative defaults
  - Mark Anchor D as "low-confidence placeholder"
  - Reduce Anchor D weight to 15%, redistribute 10% to other anchors

================================================================
PART 3 — FIVE INDEPENDENT ANCHORS
================================================================

Each anchor computes a different facet of "where does this stock
become overvalued?" Independence is critical for the convergence
test in Part 4.

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANCHOR A — Technical resistance level
----------------------------------------------------------------

Logic: Past 12 months of trading reveals where supply has historically
overwhelmed demand.

Formula:
  Anchor_A = 0.6 × (volume-weighted upper bound of past 12-month
             trading range) + 0.4 × (52-week high)

Method for volume-weighted upper bound:
  Take the 3 monthly candles with highest volume in past 12 months,
  average their HIGH prices.

Skip Anchor A if:
  - Stock just made a new 52-week high (no overhead supply)
  - Stock has been in a tight range <8% (insufficient signal)

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANCHOR B — Dividend-yield reversion
----------------------------------------------------------------

Logic: For income-paying stocks, institutional capital reallocates
out when yield compresses too close to risk-free + risk premium.

Formula:
  Critical_Yield = LongTermBondYield + RiskPremium
  Anchor_B = AnnualizedDividend / Critical_Yield

Risk premium:
  - Highest quality (utility, staple monopoly):     1.0-1.3%
  - Stable mature business (consumer brand):        1.5-2.0%
  - Cyclical or moderately stable:                  2.5-3.5%

Skip Anchor B if ANY:
  - TTM yield <2.0% (mechanically unstable, low-signal)
  - Dividend recently cut/suspended
  - Payout ratio >120%
  - Stock doesn't pay ordinary dividend

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANCHOR C — PE multiple mean reversion
----------------------------------------------------------------

Logic: Short-term moves often mean-revert toward historical or
peer multiple ranges.

Formula:
  Adjusted_PE_Center = min(
    5-year PE median for this stock,
    75th percentile of current peer-group PE
  )

  Anchor_C = EPS_TTM × Adjusted_PE_Center

Adjustments:
  - If business has undergone a structural change in past 2 years
    (new business model, major M&A, regime shift like AI capex
    for big tech), use only the 75th percentile peer PE, weight
    reduced to 15%
  - If EPS_TTM negative or distorted: use 3-year normalized EPS,
    flag

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANCHOR D — Intrinsic value Fair-ish ceiling
----------------------------------------------------------------

Logic: If a prior long-term IV exists, the short-term "no longer
cheap, not yet expensive" upper edge is mechanical:

  Bargain zone:    IV × (1 - MOS)
  Fair-ish center: IV × (1 - MOS/2)
  Fair-ish upper:  IV × (1 - MOS/3)   ← Anchor D
  Full value:      IV
  Expensive:       IV × 1.15+

Formula:
  Anchor_D = Base_IV × (1 - MOS / 3)

If no IV exists: see Part 2 placeholder method.

Default MOS if unspecified: 30%

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANCHOR E — Sector sentiment mean reversion
----------------------------------------------------------------

Logic: Short-window stock movements are largely driven by
sector-level sentiment, not isolated stock moves.

Formula:
  Anchor_E = Current_Price × (1 + R)

R table by sector position:
  Deep bottom, just turning up:           25-35%
  Moderate recovery, earnings-driven:     15-22%  [DEFAULT]
  Sideways:                               10-15%
  Near 52-week high:                       5-10%
  Overheated (PE >90th percentile):        0-5%

Sector position formula:
  Position_Index = (Sector index % from 52-week low) ×
                   (Sector PE percentile rank) / 2

  0-25:   deep bottom
  25-50:  moderate recovery [DEFAULT if uncertain]
  50-75:  sideways
  75-90:  near high
  >90:    overheated

Sector definition: state which sector index is being used and why.
For multi-sector companies, use the dominant revenue segment's
sector or the index the stock is most correlated with over the
past 6 months.

Skip Anchor E if:
  - Stock-sector correlation has broken down (rolling 90-day
    correlation <0.4)
  - Unique business with no clean sector comparison

================================================================
PART 4 — CONVERGENCE TEST
================================================================

Default weights:
  Anchor A (Technical):  20%
  Anchor B (Yield):      25%
  Anchor C (PE):         20%
  Anchor D (IV):         25%
  Anchor E (Sentiment):  10%

If an anchor is skipped, redistribute its weight proportionally
across remaining anchors. State the reallocation explicitly.

Compute:
  Weighted Mean μ = Σ(Anchor_i × Weight_i)
  Range = max - min
  Standard Deviation σ
  Coefficient of Variation CV = σ / μ

Grading:
  CV <3%:    EXCELLENT — use μ directly
  CV 3-6%:   GOOD — use μ, note ±5% buffer
  CV 6-10%:  FAIR — use median, output range
  CV >10%:   POOR — framework fails, refuse single number

The CV check is the framework's circuit breaker. Honor it.

================================================================
PART 5 — PRE-MORTEM
================================================================

Mandatory before final output.

Question 1 (downside):
"In 3 months, the stock did NOT reach μ. What is the single
most likely reason — specific to this stock?"

If the honest answer suggests >50% probability of not reaching μ:
  - Lower μ by 5-10%
  - Re-test convergence
  - If can't lower without breaking CV<10%, output range only

Question 2 (upside):
"In 3 months, the stock blew through μ by 15%+. What did
the framework miss?"

If the answer identifies a specific unpriced catalyst (M&A bid,
sector rotation, surprise earnings), flag it explicitly in output.

================================================================
PART 6 — FINAL OUTPUT
================================================================

Structure (≤400 words):

1. Stock and window: [TICKER], 3 months
2. Current price: [price] (date)

3. Five anchors:
   Anchor A — Technical:  [price]
   Anchor B — Yield:      [price] or [SKIPPED + reason]
   Anchor C — PE:         [price]
   Anchor D — IV:         [price]
   Anchor E — Sentiment:  [price]

4. Convergence:
   CV = [X%], Grade = [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]
   Weighted Mean μ = [price]

5. Overvaluation zones:
   - Fair-ish upper edge:  μ × 0.97
   - Mildly overvalued:    μ
   - Clearly overvalued:   μ × 1.05
   - Speculative zone:     μ × 1.10+

6. Suggested limit-order price (avoid round numbers):
   [μ rounded down to non-integer position]

7. The 1 most likely reason this price won't be reached in window.

8. Confidence: High / Medium / Low

9. If unreached at expiry, what to revisit:
   [specific anchor most likely to shift based on upcoming
   catalysts]

If CV >10%:
   Output items 1-4 only, then:
   "Framework fails — anchors disagree. Re-evaluate the underlying
   business before any short-term decision. Do not execute a
   mechanical exit."

================================================================
WHAT THIS FRAMEWORK DOES NOT DO
================================================================

This framework does NOT advise on:
- Whether YOU should sell (depends on your situation, not valuation)
- How much to sell (position sizing is yours)
- When to sell within the window (only the price gate)
- Tax considerations
- Reinvestment decisions

It only answers: "At what price does this stock become overvalued
in the next 3 months?"

You take that answer and decide how to act on it.