Reading

In October 2026, insider buying activity in Asian markets reached its highest level since October 2018, involving approximately US$2.9 billion. Michael Fritzell, author of the investment blog Asian Century Stocks, citing data from Smart Insider, noted that this round of buying occurred after recent declines in share prices. Bullish sentiment is present across all major global regions except the United States, with South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and Hong Kong being particularly prominent. In South Korea, the ratio of insider buys to sells over the past month has rebounded to nearly 5 times, while in Thailand it is approximately 4 times.

Why should investors pay attention to insider buying? Fritzell cites academic research indicating that stocks with insider buying tend to outperform the broader market by 6%-10% over the long term, but he simultaneously marks the boundaries of this effect: it varies by market and time period, is stronger in smaller companies, and largely disappears for routine purchases. He explicitly reminds readers that this is a statistical tendency rather than a prediction for individual stocks.

The article presents the first of five insider buying cases—Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI.JK, market capitalization approximately US$23 billion); the remaining four are behind a paywall. BBRI is a state-owned bank in Indonesia, and its business characteristics constitute a signal case worth deconstructing.

BBRI’s profitability is exceptionally outstanding among global banks currently. Its return on equity (ROE) is 19%, and its equity-to-assets ratio is 14%. The net interest margin reached 7.7% in the first half of 2026. The sources of this high margin include Indonesia’s structurally high inflation and interest rates, which allow the bank to lend at higher interest rates while paying almost no interest to depositors. Approximately 43% of the loan portfolio is concentrated in microloans, supported by a vast branch network that forms a competitive barrier. Some microloans are secured, some are unsecured, and some benefit from partial credit guarantees provided by the government.

However, there are concerns regarding the quality of growth. Recent loan growth of 16% and net profit growth of 17% include some contribution from lower-margin corporate loans rather than microloans. Credit costs of approximately 3%, while normal for the microloan business, still constitute a practical drag. Fritzell also points out that BBRI benefited from the recent rate-hike cycle—deposits carry almost no cost, while lending rates are priced at a spread above the policy rate—this structural advantage may not be sustainable in the long term.

The core of the signal lies in timing. In October 2026, senior officer Alexander Yunimar Situmorang purchased US$164,000 worth of BBRI shares, precisely occurring after MSCI threatened to downgrade Indonesia to Standalone Market status (with the next decision date scheduled for June 2027). Fritzell considers this a typical post-panic buy scenario: the market sold off due to the downgrade threat, and insiders subsequently entered. Currently, BBRI’s stock trades at a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 6.9x, a dividend yield of 12%, and a price-to-book (P/B) ratio of 1.3x, while its historical ROE has been in the 20%-30% range.

NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG), a US provider of electricity, natural gas, and smart home solutions, announced its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, on November 9, 2026. The company reported GAAP Net Income of $561 million and basic GAAP EPS of $2.59. Non-GAAP metrics included Adjusted Net Income of $983 million, Adjusted EPS of $4.68, and Adjusted EBITDA of $2,013 million.

The significant year-over-year improvement in profitability was driven by contributions from the portfolio acquired from LS Power, higher realized capacity prices in the East, and favorable weather impacts in Texas. These benefits were partially offset by increased depreciation, amortization, and interest expenses associated with the acquired assets and related financing.

In addition to reaffirming its 2026 guidance, NRG initiated its 2027 financial guidance for the first time. The 2027 Adjusted EPS range is set at $8.05 to $10.05, with Adjusted EBITDA guided between $5.5 billion and $6.0 billion. It is noted that the current 2027 guidance does not reflect the expected impacts of the previously announced 4.9 GW asset sale.

The company also updated its capital allocation plan. Beyond the 2026 plan of $1 billion in share repurchases and approximately $407 million in dividends, NRG announced a 2027 base plan including $1 billion in debt reduction, $1 billion in share repurchases, and an 8% increase in the annual common dividend to $2.05 per share. Proceeds from the upcoming asset sale are expected to support a pro forma $3 billion share repurchase program across 2026 and 2027.

Following Nvidia's board announcement of an independent investigation into CEO Jensen Huang, several U.S. shareholder rights law firms have moved quickly to launch securities fraud probes. TechCrunch reports that Schall, Brown & Schwartz, a Los Angeles-based firm, was among the first to announce an investigation into whether Nvidia made false or misleading statements or failed to disclose pertinent information to investors. Robert Bartlett, a Stanford Law professor and securities law expert, expects many other firms to follow suit, noting that a lawsuit could have been filed by Monday's close.

The legal action centers on Nvidia's previous public statements. When The New York Times first reported last month on Huang's ties to Alice Huang, an executive at Singapore data center company Megaspeed, an Nvidia spokesperson described the relationship as "not unusual or unexpected," stating that Megaspeed was no different than other regional cloud customers. However, after Huang acknowledged an intimate relationship to the board, and reports emerged that U.S. intelligence had monitored Alice Huang for over a year on suspicion of spying for China, experts view the earlier statement as "clearly a misleading statement." As CEO, Huang's knowledge is legally imputed to the company.

Bartlett explains that these cases typically rely on the "fraud on the market" theory, where investors argue they paid inflated prices based on false or incomplete public information and suffered losses when the truth emerged and the stock dropped. Nvidia's shares slid more than 4% on the first trading day after the board's announcement, providing a basis for calculating damages. Given Nvidia's status as one of the world's most valuable companies, potential settlements could be exceedingly expensive. Such litigation often settles after long proceedings, with payments coming from the company and its directors-and-officers insurers, though shareholders ultimately bear the cost through premiums or direct impacts.

Beyond direct securities claims, Nvidia faces governance risks. If the investigation reveals that directors failed in their oversight duties or lacked proper reporting lines to escalate critical risks once media reports began, board-level liability is possible. A third category of exposure would arise if the board finds Huang knew about the intelligence connection, which Bartlett calls "a whole other ball game." This could theoretically lead to SEC officer-and-director bars, although current political dynamics make immediate regulatory action less likely.

US investment bank Oppenheimer upgraded Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) from "Perform" to "Outperform" on November 9, 2026, setting a new price target of $600. The firm cited strong data center performance and growing demand for AMD's artificial intelligence (AI) chips following the company's latest earnings call as key reasons for the more bullish stance.

After discussions with AMD CFO Jean Hu and Vice President of Investor Relations Matt Ramsay, Oppenheimer highlighted server CPUs and initial shipments of the MI455 and Helios products as primary drivers behind approximately doubled data center growth. The analysts expect data center revenue to accelerate further through 2027, with GPU sales eventually surpassing EPYC server CPU revenue. AMD management has projected overall revenue growth exceeding 80% in 2027.

Oppenheimer estimates that AMD will reach approximately 3 gigawatts of data center capacity in 2027 and 4 gigawatts in 2028. Consequently, the firm predicts data center revenue will increase by 135% next year and eventually account for about 85% of total sales. This outlook is supported by AMD's plan to maintain an annual product release schedule, with the MI500 expected in 2027 and the MI600 following in 2028 to keep the company competitive in the AI accelerator market.

On the demand side, Oppenheimer expects OpenAI and Meta (NASDAQ: META) to support data center growth through the first quarter of next year, followed by another batch of orders from Anthropic in later quarters. Additionally, AMD shares could benefit from increasing demand for high-performance computing and related infrastructure investments. The five largest cloud service providers are expected to spend approximately $1.3 trillion on capital expenditures in 2027, up from $800 billion in 2026.

Other Wall Street firms have also responded positively to AMD's Q3 results. DA Davidson raised its price target to $600 while maintaining a "Buy" rating, StoneX reiterated "Buy" with a $685 target, TD Cowen maintained "Buy" with a $675 target, and Baird reiterated "Outperform" with a street-high $1,250 target. These moves reinforce the growing importance of AMD's business model, particularly its data center efforts, and the market's optimism about its success.

Does the relocation of gold reserves from the United States signal a weakening of the U.S. dollar's reserve status? In a FEDS note published in November 2026, Federal Reserve staff member Colin Weiss provides a data-driven negative answer by reviewing the repatriation cases of three euro area central banks—Germany, the Netherlands, and France—since 2013. The analysis shows that while these central banks transferred gold out of U.S. vaults, the share of the U.S. dollar in their foreign exchange reserves did not experience a substantial decline.

This finding is significant because it distinguishes between two different behavioral patterns. For Russia and Turkey, gold repatriation occurred simultaneously with a reduction in U.S. dollar holdings: Russia accumulated gold and reduced its dollar positions in the 2010s due to concerns over U.S. financial sanctions; Turkey moved gold stored in the United States and the United Kingdom back to its domestic territory in 2018 amid geopolitical tensions, while significantly lowering its share of dollar reserves. For these two countries, the core motivation for repatriating gold was to evade sanctions and asset freeze risks, and since U.S. dollar assets themselves are tools of sanction, the two decisions were logically consistent.

The situation in the euro area is different. Between 2013 and 2017, Germany transferred approximately one-fifth of its gold held in the United States to domestic vaults, maintaining its share of dollar foreign exchange reserves at around 90% during this period, and currently exceeding 80%. In 2014, the Netherlands repatriated about two-fifths of its U.S.-custodied gold to Amsterdam, with its dollar share remaining stable at approximately 83%. From 2025 to early 2026, France moved all its U.S.-held gold back home, with its dollar share stabilizing at 60%. Weiss notes in a footnote that the official statements from these central banks regarding gold relocation do not list sanctions or expropriation risks as primary motivations.

Weiss explains why the custodial location of gold and the share of dollar reserves are two decisions that can be decoupled. As a reserve asset, gold can help evade financial sanctions and asset seizures, but this advantage only holds if the gold is not stored within the jurisdiction of the government imposing sanctions. Meanwhile, the share of the U.S. dollar in foreign exchange reserves depends on sanctions risk, but also on the size and strength of the U.S. economy, as well as the unmatched depth and liquidity of U.S. financial markets. For euro area central banks, the economic benefits of allocating reserves to U.S. dollar assets appear to outweigh potential costs, meaning that even after relocating gold, there was no trigger for reducing dollar holdings.

It should be noted that this FEDS note represents the personal academic analysis of Federal Reserve Board staff and does not reflect the policy position of the Federal Reserve. Weiss himself acknowledges that the Netherlands did see a 10-percentage-point decline in its dollar share when it moved gold to London in 2026, although this level remains higher than the 2018 low and the dollar still dominates Dutch foreign exchange reserves. Additionally, a footnote mentions inconsistencies between the Netherlands Bank's annual report and the IMF's IRFCL monthly data after 2022, advising readers to exercise caution when interpreting specific figures.

According to a report by the Financial Times, Apple Inc. has shifted its primary tax haven status from Ireland to Singapore, as revealed in its latest annual filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This marks the first time Apple has provided such detailed country-level tax disclosures under new US accounting regulations.

The Financial Times estimates that Apple saved approximately $2.7 billion in taxes during fiscal year 2026 by booking profits in Singapore. Although Singapore's implementation of a new global minimum supplementary tax increased Apple's local tax burden by about $2.5 billion, the net savings compared to other jurisdictions remained substantial.

The filing shows Apple achieved a pre-tax income of $159.2 billion and paid $27.1 billion in income taxes for the fiscal year, resulting in an effective tax rate of 17.0%. Previously, Apple relied heavily on Ireland's low corporate tax rates, but international tax reforms have necessitated a restructuring of its global profit allocation.

For investors, this transparency offers a clearer view of how geographic tax strategies impact net income. While the FT estimates that up to $50 billion in profits flowed through Singapore entities, Apple has not independently confirmed this specific figure, only disclosing the tax effects required by the new standards.