ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsTopic · 可穿戴脑电AI训练争议Material3 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

Investigation: Wearable Sleep Trackers Using Brainwaves to Train AI Models Without Explicit Consent

A joint investigation by Science and the Pulitzer Center found that neurotech companies accumulated tens of millions of hours of EEG data for AI training without prior explicit disclosure in privacy policies.

2026-11-09 20:00 GMT+8

According to a report by Tom's Hardware, a recent investigation by Science magazine and the Pulitzer Center's AI Accountability Network found that several consumer neurotechnology companies are using users' electroencephalography (EEG) data—electrical signals generated by brain activity—to train artificial intelligence models, without having previously disclosed this use clearly in their privacy policies. These companies have accumulated tens of millions of hours of EEG recordings.

Canadian firm Interaxon, maker of the Muse sleep and meditation headband, is one of the named entities. Its devices monitor electrical activity in the brain alongside other physiological measurements while users sleep. Nadia Kumentas, Interaxon's Chief Marketing Officer, stated that the company has already trained an AI model using about 50,000 hours of EEG recordings and claims it removes identifying information such as names, emails, and addresses before using the data. However, prior to speaking with Science, Interaxon's privacy policy did not explicitly disclose that users' brain recordings could be used to train foundation models. Kumentas acknowledged, "We agree users should be explicitly informed." For customers whose recordings had already been used, this classification came late, likely exposing the company to potential lawsuits.

Emotiv, another wearable EEG maker, is also training its Large Brain model partly on recordings from customers using its high-end devices. Following questions from Science, Emotiv updated its privacy policy to disclose the use of de-identified neural data for model training subject to opt-in consent.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

The logic behind these systems differs from training large language models. Instead of feeding AI enormous amounts of text, developers supply it with recordings of electrical activity in the brain. The model then learns recurring patterns that can be adapted to recognize different brain states or assist with specific research tasks. For instance, AI startup Piramidal trained its model on more than 4 million hours of EEG data in partnership with Cleveland Clinic, developing a seizure-detection system that correctly identified nine out of ten seizures in a pilot study. However, this does not mean consumer headbands can read thoughts; most wearable EEG devices use only one to six electrodes, considerably fewer than the 19 to 25 typically found in clinical EEG systems, and their recordings are generally less comprehensive.

Privacy implications in wearable brain technology are not entirely new. In February, an engineer discovered he could access other people's brainwave recordings through a smart sleep mask he had purchased. Furthermore, the investigation revealed that more than two-thirds of the companies studied explicitly allowed corporate transfers of data without user consent. This could be significant if a small neurotechnology firm is acquired, potentially putting its accumulated recordings in the hands of a new owner. Currently, Colorado and California in the United States have amended their consumer privacy laws to cover neural data, although other states lag behind.

Sources

  • tomshardware.comTom's Hardware↗
Topic

可穿戴脑电AI训练争议

加拿大神经科技公司 Interaxon 和 Emotiv 等可穿戴设备制造商被曝在未经用户明确同意的情况下,利用数千万小时的脑电图(EEG)数据训练“大脑基础模型”。《科学》杂志与普利策中心 AI 问责网络于2026年11月发布的调查显示,…

3 steps1 piecesUpdated 2026-11-10 02:19

How it got here

  1. 2026-11-04《科学》杂志发布由记者 Jonathan Moens 撰写的年度调查,指出57家消费级 EEG 公司中,绝大多数允许将匿名化或去标识化的脑数据共享给第三方,且未明确披露用于AI训练。insidebci.com ↗
  2. 2026-11-09Tom's Hardware 报道确认,Muse 头带制造商 Interaxon 使用约5万小时去标识化 EEG 数据训练AI模型,其首席营销官 Nadia Kumentas 承认此前隐私政策未明确披露,现已更新。tomshardware.com ↗
  3. 2026-11-09另一家 EEG 设备商 Emotiv 表示其 Large Brain 模型部分基于高端设备用户数据训练,并在《科学》问询后更新隐私政策,要求用户对神经数据用于模型训练进行显式选择加入(opt-in)。gate.com ↗

What is still unsettled

  • 去标识化(De-identification)在法律上是否等同于获得了对原始生物特征数据进行AI训练的充分同意?
  • 当脑数据被嵌入基础模型权重后,用户行使“删除权”的技术可行性与法律执行路径是什么?
  • 中国公安部推荐的 GA/T 2372-2026 标准如何平衡道路安全监控与驾驶员神经隐私保护?
Read the full topic →
Continue researching →