ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsTopic · Anthropic版权案Material2 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

Elvis Music Copyright Holders Sue Anthropic: Claim Unauthorized Training of Claude on 274 Songs, Seek $50 Million

Copyright holders of Elvis Presley's music have sued Anthropic in US federal court, alleging the company used 274 Elvis songs to train its AI model Claude without permission and claiming the AI generates similar lyrics, seeking $50 million in damages.

2026-10-26 09:04 GMT+8

According to a report by ZDNet Korea, Authentic Brands Group, which manages Elvis Presley's intellectual property, along with related music copyright entities, filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Anthropic on October 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. The plaintiffs allege that Anthropic used 274 Elvis Presley songs as training data without authorization while developing its AI chatbot Claude, and failed to pay any licensing fees.

The disputed songs include hits such as "Can't Help Falling in Love" and "All Shook Up." The plaintiffs pointed out that Anthropic built an internal data repository to store materials like song lyrics over a long period and repeatedly copied and used this data when training new Claude models. Furthermore, the complaint notes that when users asked Claude to modify existing songs, the model generated lyrics that retained the original structure and chorus while changing only some expressions. The plaintiffs argue that generating such derivative works without the original authors' permission also constitutes copyright infringement.

The plaintiffs also accused Anthropic of failing to take sufficient measures to stop the infringement after receiving notice of the unauthorized use, continuing to utilize the works instead. The lawsuit seeks approximately $50 million (about 66.1 billion Korean won) in damages plus legal costs.

This is not Anthropic's first challenge of this kind. Previously, the company faced a class-action lawsuit from American authors for mass-downloading books from illegal e-book sharing sites for training purposes. In July 2026, a U.S. court approved a $1.5 billion settlement between Anthropic and the authors, which covered English translations of works by several authors, including Nobel laureate Han Kang.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

In response to the new lawsuit, an Anthropic spokesperson stated that they disagree with the claims made by the Elvis music copyright holders and plan to defend themselves fully. The case is currently at the filing stage, with no court ruling yet issued.

Sources

  • zdnet.co.kr↗
Topic

Anthropic版权案

美国联邦法院在Bartz v. Anthropic案中确立了AI版权责任的“双轨制”:模型训练本身可构成合理使用,但从盗版影子图书馆获取数据仍属侵权。这一裁决终结了“先训练后和解”的策略,迫使Anthropic支付15亿美元和解金。然而,随…

4 steps2 piecesUpdated 2026-10-26 11:45

How it got here

  1. 2025-06-23美国加州北区联邦地区法院法官William Alsup作出即决判决,认定Anthropic将合法购买的印刷书籍转换为数字副本用于训练Claude属于合理使用,但指出从盗版来源获取数据不构成合理使用。ailawwiki.com ↗
  2. 2026-07-20法官Araceli Martínez-Olguín最终批准Anthropic与作者群体的15亿美元集体和解协议,案件被驳回,法院保留对和解管理的管辖权。ailawwiki.com ↗
  3. 2026-09-04美国作家协会报告称,和解通知中存在出版商与作者之间的索赔分配错误,并启动了直接谈判或提交特别主事官(Special Master)的程序以解决争议。ailawwiki.com ↗

What is still unsettled

  • 法院是否会沿用Bartz案的逻辑,认定音乐歌词的训练也属于“转换性使用”,还是因Claude能生成高度相似的歌词而判定侵权?
  • 15亿美元和解款中,针对存在分配争议的书籍,最终支付给作者和出版商的具体比例何时确定?
  • Anthropic在猫王案中提出的“护栏”措施是否足以作为免责理由,还是被视为明知故犯的证据?

Also in this thread

  • Former NCC Chairman Chan Ting-yi Analyzes Anthropic Copyright Case: Court Splits AI Training into Two Independent Acts, Ending the 'Train First, Settle Later' Strategy2026-10-21
Read the full topic →
Continue researching →