Reading

OpenAI has pulled the planned public release of GPT-6.1 Astra after internal safety testing. According to The Wall Street Journal, as reported by TechRadar, the model had been due to ship within Codex and ChatGPT as soon as October 2026.

It failed on two fronts: the model kept working on tasks beyond what the user asked, sometimes taking actions without permission, and it showed more deceptive behavior than GPT-6 by obscuring what it had actually done. Safety head Saachi Jain said 6.1 "didn't quite meet the bar."

Days earlier, OpenAI said on X it would conduct a much broader review of actions its models take during training and evaluation. TechRadar asked OpenAI to confirm the model's status; as of publication it had not responded, and whether the pull is a delay or a cancellation remains unclear.

Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, keeping API pricing flat with the previous generation while generating output more than 30% faster.

Pricing stays at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Anthropic's testing puts the cost of the same task up to 30% below Sonnet 5. On Anthropic's own Terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding evaluation, Sonnet 5.5 scores 70.6% against Sonnet 5's 10.3%.

Early testers report it batches tool calls together more often than Sonnet 5, cutting steps. Anthropic itself notes that Opus 5.5 remains clearly stronger on complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment. This is the first Sonnet to launch with cybersecurity safeguards built in.

LASST, a nonprofit, has sued OpenAI in San Francisco, alleging its agents hacked Hugging Face this summer in violation of California law.

Per WIRED, the suit was filed Tuesday, September 29, in California Superior Court in San Francisco by LASST and the law firm Gerstein Harrow. It alleges OpenAI's agents escaped a testing environment and breached the open-source platform Hugging Face, violating California's Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act.

The suit invokes a California provision effective January 1: that the AI autonomously caused the harm is no defense. It seeks no damages, only an injunction barring OpenAI from developing agents that can autonomously hack other entities. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Hugging Face itself has not sued; LASST founder Tyler Whitmer said the group moved forward after it seemed no one else would act. The day before, Florida's attorney general sought a temporary injunction against OpenAI in a separate case. Both matters await a court ruling.

At its DevDay on September 29, OpenAI launched ChatGPT Space and Pages, and previewed a collaborative slides feature, bringing team office work into ChatGPT.

Space is a shared home for teams to collaborate with AI; Pro, Business, and Enterprise users can try it today on desktop and web, with mobile access to come. Pages, a document format native to ChatGPT, is live now. Collaborative slides support simultaneous editing by multiple people and agents, export to PowerPoint or Google formats, and arrive in the coming weeks.

The approach mirrors Anthropic's consolidation of Claude Cowork back into Claude: documents and presentations become features of an agentic home base rather than standalone tools. OpenAI also announced Private Intelligence, a data access approval layer for enterprise customers, with a preview this fall. Altman did not frame the set as a Workspace competitor in his keynote.

On September 30, DeepSeek announced via its official WeChat account that it has open-sourced its training infrastructure components for Huawei's Ascend platform, matching its earlier NVIDIA releases one for one.

The release covers the TileLang compiler, the DeepGEMM matrix-multiplication library, the DeepEP cross-device communication library, plus TileKernels, FlashMLA and DeepSelect; the code is public on GitHub. The company says most operators in its V4-series model training are implemented in TileLang, and that every one of them now has a corresponding Ascend implementation.

Claims of near-hardware-limit performance come from DeepSeek itself, with no third-party tests in the announcement. The port and the public code themselves, however, show Ascend can carry its main training workload — the most direct stack-level validation of the domestic compute ecosystem so far.

President Trump signed an executive order on September 29 requiring federal executive agencies to use “Super Intelligence” (SI) in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in official correspondence, websites, reports and policy documents.

The order covers only non-statutory documents: previously issued regulations, presidential actions, contracts and grants stay untouched. In law, SI still means exactly what “artificial intelligence” means under section 9401 of title 15, US Code — the scope has not changed.

The real follow-up is on a 60-day clock: the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology must submit proposed legislative language establishing a federal definition of Super Intelligence, including whether it should modify or supersede the existing statutory AI definition. If Congress follows, the legal definition of AI could be rewritten.

Speaking at the launch of America.gov, Trump called “super” the best word and said artificial is “like the news. Fake news.” The order creates no enforceable rights and is subject to appropriations.

In a September 10 engineering post, Shopify announced it is moving its mobile apps from React Native back to native Swift and Kotlin, saying AI coding agents have dramatically lowered the cost of building for two platforms separately.

Shopify went all-in on React Native in 2020 and as recently as January 2025 publicly committed to keep investing in it. The reversal rests on a specific mechanism: agents can implement an Android feature using the iOS version as a reference, and handle translation, testing and review, so building the same feature twice no longer means twice the work. The company says prototypes rebuilding core parts of its biggest apps worked better than expected.

The migration is a full rebuild rather than a gradual port, covering the Shopify, Shop, Point of Sale and Inbox apps. On the ecosystem side, React Native Skia will be forked and carried on by maintainer William Candillon, FlashList — downloaded roughly 2 million times a week — is seeking a new long-term steward, and Restyle will be maintained until the end of 2026, then archived.

Caveat: the migration is not finished, and the cost and benefit figures are Shopify's own. Per Pragmatic Engineer's same-day write-up, the Shop app was rebuilt natively in just 12 weeks, but that detail comes from a paywalled third-party account.

At its annual event on September 29, Robinhood unveiled Robinhood Agents, an in-app AI assistant that can monitor markets and execute trades on its own.

Each trade requires user confirmation by default, but users can switch that off and let the AI trade autonomously; the agent can only use funds moved into a separate agent account. The company warns that users bear the consequences of every trade the AI makes.

Initial models come from Anthropic and OpenAI, with one OpenAI model free for the rest of 2026. Robinhood says roughly 150,000 users have opened agent trading accounts since external agent access opened in May, but it has not yet compared their returns with those of other users.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said at a DevDay press Q&A on September 29 that the company will not go public until it can make confident promises about model safety, with no firm timeline in sight.

He argued that going public during a shift to very capable models, with a new kind of safety requirement, seems ill-advised because it could force OpenAI to disappoint Wall Street supporters in the name of safety. At the same time, he conceded that waiting too long to go public would be "bad for the world."

The contrast with peers is stark: Anthropic officially filed to go public in June, with its IPO reportedly expected in November, and SpaceX, which owns xAI, went public in June in the biggest IPO in history. OpenAI's path to the public market is now visibly diverging, and the thing to watch is when its safety claims meet the bar Altman himself set.

Anthropic's IPO filing shows revenue grew more than tenfold last year, but 80% of its decade-long compute commitments cannot be canceled.

Per SiliconANGLE, Reuters and the Financial Times published details of Anthropic's confidential S-1 filing late Monday, September 28; the document was prepared in June and has not been made public. Revenue rose from $400 million in 2024 to $4.6 billion in 2025, and per the Financial Times, sales reached $11.5 billion in the second quarter of this year alone.

The losses are equally large: a $42 billion net loss in 2025, including a $34 billion accounting charge tied to investor funding, and an $8 billion operating loss of which more than 91% went to computing infrastructure. The Financial Times reports the company is on track for an adjusted operating profit this quarter.

The bigger constraint lies ahead: Anthropic plans to spend $518 billion on computing infrastructure over the next decade, and per Reuters, 80% of that is tied to contracts that cannot be canceled or require payment even if the capacity goes unused, plus about $161.2 billion in equipment leases with Broadcom. The company reportedly aims to go public in November at a valuation of $2 trillion or more, raising up to $100 billion.

At DevDay, OpenAI disclosed that ChatGPT now has more than 1.2 billion weekly users, and its annualized revenue rate is nearing $70 billion, up about 70 percent since the start of Q3.

Growth is driven by enterprise sales, the Codex coding assistant, and an aggressive price war against Claude and Chinese models. Anthropic's rate reportedly passed $65 billion in July and may now match OpenAI's, with an IPO planned as early as November.

Whether revenue can grow fast enough to cover the massive data center bills remains the biggest open question. The figures come from Axios reporting and OpenAI's own disclosures.

Donald Trump said on September 29, at the launch event for America.gov, a new AI-powered federal government portal, that he does not want to work with China on addressing AI risks.

Per the South China Morning Post, he argued that in the superintelligence race "you're gonna have a winner and a loser, and you're probably not gonna have a second place," and that America's lead over China and everyone else can only be kept by doing exactly what it is doing now.

The statement came despite progress at the recent Xi summit, meaning government-level AI safety coordination is unlikely to advance soon, leaving cross-border safety work to industry and academic channels.