Reading

Despite viewing itself as a global pioneer in artificial intelligence regulation, the European Union's own institutions in Brussels and Strasbourg are grappling with the consequences of uncontrolled generative AI use. According to a report by German tech media heise online citing independent news platform Rapporteur, the EU Parliament and Commission are being overwhelmed by automatically generated content, causing organizational problems that are difficult to manage even with technical assistance.

Alessandro Chiocchetti, Secretary-General of the European Parliament, recently warned of a rapid increase in amendments, parliamentary questions, petitions, and requests for access to files driven by generative AI. Parliament President Roberta Metsola also expressed concern, urging members not to delegate democratic responsibility to algorithms and emphasizing that AI-drafted amendments should not replace genuine dialogue with colleagues or direct contact with voters. On Thursday, the Parliament adopted a resolution on AI in administration and democracy, with new administrative guidelines expected soon.

The impact is visible in daily operations. Interpreters translating documents into 24 official languages using traditional machine translation without AI have encountered "hallucinations" in texts submitted by representatives, including references to non-existent laws. The Parliament's legal service reportedly spends days verifying these AI-generated claims. Observers note that some parliamentarians use AI to simulate activity with minimal effort to improve their standing in internal rankings.

In response, Irish Member of the European Parliament Barry Andrews introduced an internal directive prohibiting his own use of AI in votes, plenary speeches, press releases, and commission questions. Transparently, the directive itself notes it was created with AI assistance. Conversely, Swedish MEP Jörgen Warborn argues that AI significantly boosts productivity, noting that the Industrial Accelerator Act received over 5,000 amendments; while AI should not be used solely to overload the system, he welcomes greater efficiency.

Pressure extends to other bodies. A senior EU official told Rapporteur that complaints to the European Ombudsman have increased by 50% due to AI, threatening to bury the institution in paperwork. Estonian AI expert and Commission advisor Luukas Ilves describes this as a "flood" by autonomous software agents. While the EU is developing its own AI tools to analyze internal documents and keep sensitive data away from US cloud services, administrative inertia makes it challenging to compete with commercial investments from the US.

According to Tom's Hardware, Malaysia and Singapore are intensifying scrutiny of AI hardware shipments amid concerns about circumventing U.S. export restrictions on China. Malaysia's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry is investigating whether Speedmatrix, the Malaysian subsidiary of Singapore-based Megaspeed, re-exported any AI processors and servers imported for local data centers. Despite months of investigation, authorities have yet to determine if such shipments occurred or violated Malaysian laws. Malaysia introduced restrictions on the export, transit, and trans-shipment of advanced U.S.-developed AI accelerators in July 2025, requiring companies to obtain permits.

Meanwhile, Singaporean authorities have brought 41 criminal charges against Shi Bingzhe, a 34-year-old Chinese citizen who served as director of Superphi and chief operating officer of NJ Global Financial. Prosecutors allege that these two companies purchased 917 servers containing restricted Nvidia hardware from Aperia International in 41 transactions between May 2024 and February 2025, with reason to believe the servers were linked to criminal activity. The case now involves five individuals and six companies. If convicted, Shi faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of S$500,000 per charge.

In response, Megaspeed announced on November 12 that it had hired a U.S. law firm to conduct a comprehensive inventory of its AI GPUs and independently assess its compliance with U.S. export-control regulations. The company confirmed it had cooperated with inspections by the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Megaspeed CEO James Tan Yong Pong stressed that compliance and transparency are priorities, though the company did not disclose the number or models of GPUs owned, nor the specific findings of BIS inspections.

These developments highlight the critical role of Malaysia and Singapore in the supply chain of restricted AI hardware. While neither investigation has confirmed that hardware ultimately reached China, the enforcement actions illustrate the difficulties authorities face in enforcing export controls across international supply chains.