ReadingResearchRadarInvestment frameworkAI Company Primary Sources
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsMaterial3 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

US Portfolio Manager Ben Carlson: S&P 500 Earnings Growth Far Outpaces Share Prices This Year, Valuations Are Actually Compressing

Ben Carlson, portfolio manager at US-based Ritholtz Wealth Management, points out that while S&P 500 earnings grew nearly 30% in 2026, the index rose only about 12%, meaning valuations are actually contracting. He uses data on the divergence between earnings and returns across decades since the 1930s to show that such disconnects are normal, citing the semiconductor industry where profits grew nearly 200% but share prices rose only about 40% as an example of the gap between market pricing and fundamentals.

2026-10-31 04:30 GMT+8

In 2026, S&P 500 earnings growth approached 30%, while the index rose by only about 12%. This means that valuations did not expand as they typically do in a bull market; instead, they compressed. In an article published on October 30, Ben Carlson, a portfolio manager at US-based Ritholtz Wealth Management, highlighted this phenomenon as a core observation, noting that it challenges a widely held intuition: that rising markets must be accompanied by rising valuations.

Carlson first presented the trajectory of earnings expectations. At the beginning of the year, analysts estimated full-year S&P 500 earnings at slightly above $310. After several quarters of earnings reports beating expectations, this estimate has been revised upward by nearly 20%. He emphasized that this is not a long-term forecast for earnings three, five, or even ten years out, but simply for the current year, 2026. With earnings growth around 30% and price appreciation around 12%, the gap between the two directly points to declining valuations.

To illustrate that this divergence is not anomalous, Carlson looked back at data on S&P 500 earnings growth versus total returns by decade since the 1930s. He found that the two sometimes move in sync and sometimes diverge significantly: the 1940s, 1960s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s (thus far) were roughly in line; in the 1930s, the stock market performed poorly but earnings were even worse; in the 1970s, earnings far outpaced the stock market; and in the 1950s, 1980s, and 1990s, the opposite was true, with stock market gains far exceeding earnings growth. He calculated that the average absolute difference between the two numbers is close to 25%, with a median of 17%. In other words, significant divergence between earnings and returns is the norm, not the exception.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment frameworkAI Company Primary Sources

Carlson also cited more specific industry cases to illustrate how market pricing reflects expectations rather than purely fundamentals. According to statistics from The Wall Street Journal, ten companies accounted for about two-thirds of profit growth this year, with just Micron and Nvidia making up one-third of that growth. Yardeni Research pointed out that semiconductor industry profits grew nearly 200%, yet their share prices rose only about 40% year-to-date, and have currently pulled back more than 20% from their highs. It appears the market does not fully trust the earnings of these semiconductor companies.

Regarding why the market remains restrained despite strong earnings growth, Carlson proposed two possibilities. One is that investors worry that AI capital expenditure is inflating earnings figures, which may fall back down in the future. A simpler explanation is that the relationship between earnings and share prices is often broken anyway, and short-term disconnects do not require special reasons.

Carlson's conclusion is that while fundamentals drive the stock market in the long run, the market and earnings are not always synchronized in the short run. Most of the time, no one knows what has already been priced in. This makes investing in the stock market both exciting and frustrating—it is precisely this uncertainty that makes equity investment simultaneously attractive and infuriating.

Sources

  • awealthofcommonsense.comA Wealth of Common Sense↗
Continue researching →