ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsTopic · TPUv7推理性能Material3 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

SemiAnalysis: TPUv7 Delivers 1.2 to 2.7 Times More Tokens Per Dollar Than NVIDIA/AMD on GLM-5.2 AgentX

SemiAnalysis released the first cross-model results for TPUv7 on the AgentX agent inference benchmark on November 5, 2026. At FP8 precision, TPUv7 on GLM-5.2 delivers 1.2 to 2.7 times more tokens per dollar than the B200, B300, and MI355X. On Qwen3.5, TPUv7 FP8 performance per dollar is 1.67 times that of the GB300 FP4. However, NVIDIA FP4 still leads on GLM-5.2 by a factor of 3.5 to 3.6, and TPUv7 currently lacks native FP4 support. Results were submitted separately by Google (Qwen3.5), RadixArk (Muse Spark Open), and Inferact (Kimi K3) and have not been independently reproduced.

2026-11-06 03:03 GMT+8

SemiAnalysis released the first cross-model results for TPUv7 (Ironwood) on the InferenceX/AgentX agent inference benchmark on November 5, 2026. AgentX simulates real-world agent workloads characterized by multi-turn interactions, long contexts, and high prefix reuse, which differ significantly from single-turn chat scenarios. This release covers four models: Meta's Muse Spark Open (816B parameters), Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2/5.3 (744B parameter MoE), Alibaba's Qwen3.5 397B, and Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 (2.8T parameters).

At FP8 precision, the results for each model must be viewed separately. On GLM-5.2, within an interaction range of 60 to 300 tokens per second per user, TPUv7 delivers 1.2 to 2.7 times more tokens per dollar than the B200, B300, and AMD MI355X. On Qwen3.5 397B, SemiAnalysis reports that TPUv7 FP8 performance per dollar is 1.67 times that of the GB300 NVL72 FP4—this marks the first AgentX model result submitted by Google itself. On Kimi K3, results submitted by Inferact, founded by the vLLM founding team, show that TPUv7 delivers 1.15 to 2.5 times more tokens per dollar than the GB200, B200, B300, and MI355X. Muse Spark Open was submitted by RadixArk, maintained by SGLang, achieving competitive decode cost-effectiveness even on a GPU-optimized architecture theoretically unfriendly to TPUs.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

However, SemiAnalysis notes that NVIDIA FP4 still maintains a lead in pure performance per dollar. On GLM-5.2, at 100 tok/s/user, the GB300 and GB200 FP4 deliver 3.6x and 3.5x more tokens per dollar than TPUv7, respectively. This is because FP4 halves the weight bytes, and small-batch decode is memory-bandwidth bound. TPUv7 currently lacks native FP4 support, with this feature expected to arrive with TPUv8 in Q1 2027. NVIDIA submitted FP4 counter-results on Qwen3.5; while these exceeded TPUv7 FP8 in decode performance, they came at the expense of prefill, resulting in lower end-to-end performance than TPUv7 FP8.

SemiAnalysis's core argument is that TPUv7's competitiveness stems not just from hardware specifications but from ecosystem collaboration with upstream maintainers such as vLLM (Inferact, RedHat), SGLang (RadixArk), llm-d, PyTorch, and Ray. Meta has already deployed TPUv7 in production using SGLang-TorchTPU. Kimi K3.1 Pro received TPUv7 support on its release day. SemiAnalysis argues that NVIDIA's moat is being eroded from its software ecosystem, citing bureaucratic processes—such as a three-month legal review required for driver feature approvals—as a structural risk.

It is important to emphasize that the submitters of the above results vary: Qwen3.5 was submitted directly by Google, Muse Spark Open by RadixArk, and Kimi K3 by Inferact. All data are first-party results analyzed and published by SemiAnalysis and have not yet been independently reproduced. Regarding NVIDIA, preview submissions for the Rubin NVL72 suggest its performance per dollar could reach 6 times that of TPUv7, but SemiAnalysis points out this is an unfair comparison; Rubin should be benchmarked against TPUv8i rather than TPUv7. For readers making compute procurement decisions, these figures provide directional reference, but independent verification should be requested before making commitments.

Sources

  • newsletter.semianalysis.com↗
  • tomshardware.comTom's Hardware↗
Topic

TPUv7推理性能

【背景】2026年11月5日,SemiAnalysis发布报告指出,谷歌第七代张量处理单元(TPUv7 Ironwood)在长上下文、多轮智能体推理基准(AgentX)上展现出显著的成本效益优势。在FP8精度下,TPUv7运行GLM-5.2…

5 steps1 piecesUpdated 2026-11-06 06:15

How it got here

  1. 2025-11-28SemiAnalysis首次公开报道谷歌向外部客户销售TPU,并预测Oracle、OpenAI、Anthropic和Meta将成为客户。newsletter.semianalysis.com ↗
  2. 2026-09-07SemiAnalysis发布TPUv7在InferenceX单轮工作负载上的首批第三方结果,显示在Qwen3.5 FP8模式下,TPUv7每美元性能比B200/B300高50%。newsletter.semianalysis.com ↗
  3. 2026-10-21Tom's Hardware报道Meta确认在其数据中心生产环境中运行谷歌TPU推理,通过新的PyTorch原生SGLang引擎实现,无需JAX移植。tomshardware.com ↗

What is still unsettled

  • TPUv7缺乏原生FP4支持是否会在未来版本(如TPUv8i)中得到解决,从而缩小与NVIDIA GB300 NVL72的性能差距?
  • 未经独立复现的第三方基准测试结果(由Google、RadixArk、Inferact提交)能否被更广泛的行业接受为标准参考?
  • NVIDIA声称其内部团队正在加班以优化GB300 FP4性能,这一努力能否在短期内逆转TPUv7在每美元成本上的优势?
Read the full topic →
Continue researching →