lastminute.com CEO Alessandro Petazzi: AI Is Not an Inevitable Disruptor of Online Travel, but a New Channel for Demand
lastminute.com CEO Alessandro Petazzi argues that AI platforms primarily generate demand and showcase relevant products, while online travel companies remain responsible for fulfillment and regulatory compliance; the company has integrated flights, hotels, and packages into ChatGPT and Claude, and reports that some teams have 70% to 80% of their code developed using Claude Code.
Will online travel companies be replaced by AI agents? The answer from Alessandro Petazzi, CEO of lastminute.com, is no. In an interview with diginomica, he addressed a common narrative: whenever travel companies show signs of short-term weakness, the market tends to attribute it to AI. He believes this reasoning conflates a difficult market environment with AI-driven disruption. The real key is not whether AI can chat or make recommendations, but who bears responsibility after the transaction is completed.
Petazzi’s core judgment is that AI platforms will change how holidays are discovered and sold, but they will not change who is responsible for delivering them. Taking Meta’s newly launched Muse personal AI agent as an example, he emphasized that Meta did not announce its intention to replace all online travel companies, but rather needs partners like lastminute.com. The reason lies in their differing business models: AI platforms aim to create demand and surface the right offers to the right audience, whereas online travel companies focus on fulfilling that demand and managing the holiday itself.
This division of labor is underpinned by regulatory and operational responsibilities. Petazzi pointed out that package holidays in Europe come with specific protection requirements; consumers enjoy certain rights once they book, and assuming these responsibilities requires a tour operating license. In other words, when users actually place an order, the platform cannot merely stop at recommendations and price comparisons. If issues arise—such as flight cancellations, destination conflicts, or stranded travelers—the travel company is responsible for rebooking, accommodation, and follow-up care. He attributes such competitive moats to business models and regulatory obligations rather than technical capabilities.