ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsMaterial2 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

Investment Blogger Klement: The Funding Gap Between US and European Startups Concentrates at the Super Unicorn Stage, with Similar Growth-Stage Expansion Rates

Klement cites an OECD study on startups in Europe and the United States from 2000 to 2025, noting that while financing growth rates for mature companies are roughly similar across both regions, the true gap emerges at the super unicorn stage (valuations exceeding $11 billion), where US firms begin attracting significantly more capital than their European counterparts five to six years after founding. Additionally, approximately 40% of EU startups take more than seven years from their first patent application to securing sufficient funding for scaling, averaging 1.5 years longer than US peers.

2026-11-10 15:09 GMT+8

The most intuitive manifestation of the funding disadvantage facing European startups is the stark contrast in financing scale: Mistral’s $3.5 billion Series D round stands as the largest venture capital round in European history, whereas OpenAI secured $122 billion in March 2026, Anthropic raised $65 billion in May 2026, and xAI obtained $20 billion in the first quarter of 2026. Placing Mistral’s $3.5 billion round within a list of the largest US funding rounds would rank it only 19th. Investment blogger Joachim Klement uses these figures to pose a question, but subsequently cites a new OECD study to sharpen the comparison.

The OECD study covers startups founded in the European Union and the United States between 2000 and 2025, categorizing successfully scaled enterprises into two types: 'rising superstars' (companies eventually reaching valuations over $11 billion) and 'growth-oriented companies' (those raising lead rounds of $50 million). The core finding is that growth-oriented companies experience roughly identical financing growth rates in both Europe and the US—indicating that Europe does not lack capital supply for mid-sized growth firms. The real divergence occurs at the super unicorn stage: five to six years after launch, US firms begin attracting far greater capital than their European peers.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

The OECD also provided another set of data from a temporal perspective: from the first patent application to securing sufficient funding for scaling, approximately 40% of EU startups took more than seven years, averaging 1.5 years longer than their US counterparts. Klement presents these two findings side by side to illustrate that European startups face not only a gap in top-tier capital attraction but also a delayed start in the entire scaling process. The original OECD report could not be independently verified; the above data are all paraphrases by Klement of that research.

For investors, the practical implication of this finding lies in improving diagnostic precision. If one assumes Europe’s problem is a generalized capital shortage, then any early-stage or growth fund faces the same dilemma. However, if the issue concentrates at the super unicorn stage, the variables requiring attention differ: it is not whether Europe has venture capital, but whether it has sufficiently sized follow-on round institutions and deep exit markets to support companies transitioning from good to exceptional. Klement teased at the end of the article that he would discuss another study on Thursday, identifying another key factor preventing European startups from scaling, though this was not elaborated upon in this piece.

Sources

  • klementoninvesting.substack.com↗
Continue researching →