ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsTopic · MoE专家协作剪枝Material2 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

HOPE: Incorporating Expert Pairwise Interactions into Quadratic Programming to Maintain MoE Cooperative Groups at 50% Pruning Rate

Amazon researcher Alex M. Tseng proposes the HOPE method, which constructs an expert pairwise interaction matrix and solves a quadratic program to select the pruning set. This approach maintains the cooperative structure among experts at a 50% pruning rate, keeping SWE-Bench Pro scores on par with unpruned models, whereas the independently scored REAP method saw a 13% decline.

2026-11-09 20:34 GMT+8

The vast majority of parameters in Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models remain idle—of the approximately 250 GB of VRAM occupied by Qwen3.5-122B, 95% is taken up by the MLPs of experts across all layers, yet only 8 experts are actually activated per token. Directly deleting inactive experts is the most concise path to compressing this memory bottleneck: it requires no training, no dynamic loading, and can be combined with quantization. The difficulty lies in deciding whom to delete. Existing pruning methods—such as REAP, MAN, and EAN—assign a scalar importance score to each expert independently and then remove those with the lowest scores. Author Alex M. Tseng (Amazon) points out that this approach assumes each expert's contribution is independent of others, but experimental observations indicate that experts in MoEs form stable cooperative groups that are consistently co-activated. Independent scoring completely ignores this: removing expert A may seem harmless on its own, but if A frequently cooperates with high-importance expert B, a single deletion could dismantle an entire cooperative group.

The core of HOPE is an E×E interaction matrix F. The diagonal of the matrix measures the independent importance of individual experts—which correlates highly with REAP rankings, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.988—while the off-diagonal elements capture the average gate-weighted output product of experts i and j on tokens where they are co-activated. With this matrix, selecting the pruning set becomes a quadratic programming problem: minimizing the total interaction strength among pruned experts. The solution employs continuous relaxation followed by rounding, taking 1 to 2 seconds per layer, which is negligible compared to the total overhead of pre-calibration forward propagation.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

The advantage of this mechanism is most significant at a 50% pruning rate. Taking Qwen3.5-35B-A3B as an example, after HOPE pruning, the model scored 42.3 on SWE-Bench Pro, matching the unpruned model's 41.8; whereas REAP dropped to 36.2 under the same conditions, representing a regression of about 13%. The authors attribute this to the fact that at high pruning rates, many cooperative links face the risk of being severed, while HOPE's quadratic programming automatically sacrifices some experts with high independent scores but weak cooperative node status to preserve the overall cooperative structure.

However, the authors also acknowledge the boundaries of HOPE: at low pruning rates of 10% to 20%, first-order methods are sometimes equally competitive, narrowing HOPE's advantage; the current implementation prunes each layer independently without considering cross-layer interactions; the modeled relationships are limited to pairs, making triplet and higher-order interactions combinatorially difficult to estimate. All performance figures are self-tested by the author's team and have not yet been independently reproduced.

Sources

  • huggingface.co↗
Topic

MoE专家协作剪枝

混合专家模型(MoE)虽能高效扩展参数规模,但所有专家需常驻显存导致严重的内存瓶颈。传统剪枝方法如 REAP 采用“一阶”策略,独立评估每个专家的重要性,却忽视了专家间存在的稳定协作关系,在激进剪枝下易破坏功能模块。

4 steps1 piecesUpdated 2026-11-10 12:57

How it got here

  1. 2026-06-03北京航空航天大学 Yuhao Zhang 等人发布 SHAPE 论文,提出基于 Shapley 值的联盟感知专家剪枝框架,强调 MoE 推理的固有协作性。arxiv.org ↗
  2. 2026-09-16亚马逊 AWS Agentic AI 团队 Alex M. Tseng 等人提交 HOPE 论文初版,推导二阶剪枝目标以最小化剪枝误差上界。arxiv.org ↗
  3. 2026-09-29HOPE 论文更新至 v3 版本,确认在 Qwen3.5-122B 等前沿模型上的实验结果,显示其在高剪枝率下的优势。arxiv.org ↗

What is still unsettled

  • HOPE 与 SHAPE 等不同协作感知剪枝方法在极端稀疏度(>50%)下的长期稳定性对比如何?
  • 二阶剪枝带来的计算开销是否会在超大规模模型(>1T参数)的校准阶段成为新的瓶颈?
  • HOPE 方法与其他量化技术(如 FP8/INT4)组合使用时,是否存在非线性的性能衰减风险?
Read the full topic →
Continue researching →