ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework
Sign in / Sign up
← Back to reading
NewsMaterial3 min readDisconfirmAI Editorial

Ben Carlson: The Smarter You Are, the More Likely You Are to Make Big Mistakes in Investing—How Self-Deception Amplifies Blind Spot Bias

US wealth manager Ben Carlson uses the Theranos fraud as a starting point to argue that highly intelligent people are more prone to blind spot bias due to stronger self-deception capabilities. Cognitive science research indicates that high cognitive ability does not mitigate this bias but rather exacerbates it.

2026-10-28 03:11 GMT+8

In 2015, then-US Vice President Joe Biden visited the Silicon Valley blood-testing company Theranos and stated during a roundtable discussion that he had just witnessed "the laboratory of the future." The company promised to perform a full suite of diagnostics with just a drop of blood from a patient's fingertip. Founder Elizabeth Holmes claimed this was "the most important thing humanity has ever built." The entire company was a fraud—the lab shown to visitors was a staged set, the equipment did not actually work, and most employees were told to stay home that day. Biden was far from the only big name to be conned by Holmes.

The Walton family, heirs to the Walmart fortune, lost $150 million. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch invested $125 million based strictly on gut feeling alone; he later sold the entire stake for $1 to take a tax write-off for the enormous loss on a worthless investment. Betsy DeVos, Education Secretary under President Trump, and her wealthy family lost $100 million. Partner Fund Management, a well-known hedge fund, purchased shares at a valuation that pegged the company’s value at $9 billion, making Holmes worth a staggering $5 billion on paper.

US wealth manager Ben Carlson revisited a chapter from his book Don’t Fall For It in his blog A Wealth of Common Sense, attempting to answer an counter-intuitive question: Why were these smart, wealthy, and top-educated individuals deceived? His answer was not that they weren't smart enough, but that they were too smart. The core mechanism is blind spot bias—the tendency for people to see bias in others more easily than in themselves. Carlson argues that smart people suffer from this more severely than anyone else because they possess stronger self-deception capabilities. Once a person has achieved sufficient success, they tend to attribute it entirely to their own abilities rather than opportunity, timing, or luck. This psychological tendency to "personalize success" leads them to believe they won't make mistakes in unfamiliar fields, while those around them, respecting their intellectual status, do not question their judgment.

Sign in / Sign up
ReadingResearchRadarInvestment framework

This argument is supported by empirical evidence. Researchers Richard West, Russell Meserve, and Keith Stanovich tested seven types of cognitive abilities and found that high cognitive ability does not attenuate metacognitive bias—in other words, smarter people are worse off at recognizing their own thinking blind spots. Crucially, those who were aware of their own biases were not better able to overcome them. Carlson concludes that smart people may be less capable than ordinary people at identifying their own limitations because they have more "firepower" to convince themselves through self-deception.

For readers, the practical implication of this mechanism is: when making investment decisions in unfamiliar fields, analytical ability is not a safety cushion but a risk amplifier. When you let your guard down because "I understand complex systems," that is precisely when blind spot bias is most active. The Theranos board included former US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, former Secretary of State George Shultz, retired US Navy Admiral Gary Roughead, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and former Secretary of Defense William Perry. These individuals' judgment was unquestionable, yet it was this collective "smart people endorsing each other" that allowed the fraud to go unchallenged for years.

Carlson’s argument has a boundary that must be acknowledged: investors in the Theranos case were completely unfamiliar with blood testing technology; their errors may stem more from domain ignorance and celebrity herd behavior than from intelligence itself. The studies by West et al. measured general cognitive biases, not specifically investment decision-making scenarios. However, the direction of the mechanism still holds: when a person attributes past success entirely to their own abilities, they will overestimate their judgment in any new field. The higher the intelligence, the smoother this self-persuasion becomes and the harder it is to interrupt with external questioning.

Sources

  • awealthofcommonsense.comA Wealth of Common Sense↗
Continue researching →